| Author |
Topic  |
|
Tyson Rayles
Moderator
    
Premium Member

|
Posted - 01/22/2006 : 2:14:45 PM
|
Hi Rodney and welcome!
|
| Mike |
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 10255 |
 |
|
|
austinmp
New Hire

|
Posted - 03/21/2006 : 7:32:36 PM
|
Micro Engineering Code 55, maybe Code 40 if there were ready-made turnouts at reasonable prices. I just wish ME would start making their Code 55 turnouts again, the Atlas ones are nowhere as good, due to the flange compatibility issues they have, and ME track looks better, too, especially when it's been pre-weathered.
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 3 |
 |
|
|
steambasher
New Hire
|
Posted - 07/17/2006 : 9:02:04 PM
|
#4 answer...Kato Unitrack is all I use.


|
Edited by - steambasher on 10/28/2006 11:25:40 PM |
|
Country: Canada
| Posts: 3 |
 |
|
|
crabster
Engine Wiper
 

|
Posted - 07/18/2006 : 6:43:33 PM
|
Same here-Kato Unitrack.
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 314 |
 |
|
|
drs_rr
Engine Wiper
 
|
Posted - 07/18/2006 : 11:24:32 PM
|
It is Atlas Code 55 for myself. The last layout was Atlas Code 80, worked fine for that layout. The new one that I've started is Code 55 with #7 turnouts. Working great, and love the look. Here is a photo of what I've got done so far.

|
Dave Salamon Deep River Southern - N Scale www.picturetrail.com/salamon |
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 196 |
 |
|
|
Tyson Rayles
Moderator
    
Premium Member

|
Posted - 07/19/2006 : 5:06:33 PM
|
Impressive Dave, please keep us posted as you progress.
|
| Mike |
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 10255 |
 |
|
|
jatravia
Fireman
   
Premium Member

|
Posted - 07/19/2006 : 5:51:54 PM
|
I don't think I ever actually answered this question: I like Peco Code 55. I've gone with the electro-frog turnouts.
Joe <><
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 2564 |
 |
|
|
Cowcatcher
Fireman
   

|
Posted - 07/19/2006 : 9:40:28 PM
|
Dave,
A man after my on heart. I love Atlas C55, except for the lack of electrical continuity through the switches. Not a problem if you feed them from both sides though.
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 1453 |
 |
|
|
steambasher
New Hire
|
Posted - 09/22/2006 : 9:14:12 PM
|
(4) KATO UNITRACK
|
|
Country: Canada
| Posts: 3 |
 |
|
|
SteveNSfan
New Hire

|
Posted - 10/23/2006 : 1:55:04 PM
|
(4) Kato Unitrack. I've yet to have any problems with it.
|
|
Country: Ukraine
| Posts: 2 |
 |
|
|
toddsyr
New Hire

|
Posted - 10/23/2006 : 2:20:27 PM
|
For what it's worth from a newbie. I too use Kato Uni-Track. I only have a setup for testing purposes at this time. I find the track to be on the slippery side. It takes 2 locos to haul 15 cars without incurring alot of wheelslip. This is the larger approxiamtely 15 inch radius Uni-Track. Todd
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 38 |
 |
|
|
Don Brimmer
Fireman
   

|
Posted - 12/02/2006 : 9:29:34 PM
|
I have Atlas 55 on layout, but will use Atlas 80 on module. Don Brimmer
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 1874 |
 |
|
|
LandNnut
Fireman
   

|
Posted - 02/28/2007 : 9:36:52 PM
|
I guess I vote other. At the present I am using a mixture of peco 80 and 55 electo and inslfrog with code 80 atlas flex track on my 3x6' secnic and relaxed. I have had to use one code 80 shinahara where i managed to bust the rail out of one of my pecos. On the next layout the best choice at present appears to be fast tracks jigs for the turnouts and micro engeering code 55 and 40 flex track. By the way why is this poll at the top of the small scale forum when the last post is see is on 12-2-2006?
|
 |
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 1495 |
 |
|
|
Tyson Rayles
Moderator
    
Premium Member

|
Posted - 02/28/2007 : 10:05:15 PM
|
The thread is a sticky Jon so that when new members come along they can voice their opinion also.
|
| Mike |
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 10255 |
 |
|
|
LandNnut
Fireman
   

|
Posted - 03/01/2007 : 11:34:36 PM
|
Ok Thanks for the explanation.
|
 |
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 1495 |
 |
|
Topic  |
|